
Monthly Archives: March 2016
Today in Texas History – March 14

From the Annals of the Equines – In 1940, horse enthusiasts and ranchers met in Fort Worth to form the American Quarter Horse Association. Among those in attendance were rancher and Quarter Horse breeder Anne Burnett Hall and King Ranch president Robert J. Kleberg. The meeting was the first in a series that led to the formation of an organization to “collect, record and preserve the pedigrees of Quarter Horses in America.” The name Quarter Horse goes back to the origin in colonial times when the speedy horses earned fame for their performance in quarter-mile races. The AQHA was the first to regularize the breed and establish pedigrees. Now based in Amarillo, the AQHA is an international organization dedicated to the preservation, improvement and record-keeping of the American Quarter Horse In Texas, the Quarter Horse brings to mind images of the cowboy, the cattle drive and today – the rodeo. Quarter Horse racing is in decline across the Southwest, but the breed continues to compete in roping, barrel racing and other rodeo competitions.
Image from aqha.com.
Texans Make Bold Play in Free Agency

The Houston Texans went long in the free agent market yesterday – signing Denver Broncos “backup” quarterback Brock Osweiler and Miami Dolphins running back Lamar Miller. The moves are intended to fill two gaping holes in the Texans offense with current QB Brian Hoyer being widely viewed as a capable second stringer at best and the backfield being open following the release of running back Arian Foster.
Red rates the Miller move as a solid decision to pick up a proven running back who has averaged 4.6 yards per carry on weak to mediocre Dolphins teams. Miller also comes in at age 25 (for next season) without too much wear and tear. He has 638 carries in his 4 year career. The last two seasons, Miller also showed himself as a capable receiver averaging over 40 catches. He should be good enough to keep the job for 3-4 seasons if used wisely. Miller has said he wants 20 touches a game. If the Texans are smart, it will be about 15 and Alfred Blue will continue to get work in relief. The $26 million – 4 year deal for LM is not a budget buster. On the proverbial scale, Red weighs this one in at 7.5.
The Osweiler deal is another story. The Texans busted open the bank with a 4 year – $72 million contract for the unproven BO. The sports talk empire in Houston was naturally abuzz over the move with the local sports wags mostly buying the company line. Red has to break with Charlie Palilo, Red’s preferred drive-time radio man, on this one. The Texans have placed at least 10 of the dozen eggs in the Osweiler basket and Red thinks the bottom may not be as strong as beleaguered Texans GM Rick Smith calculates. For those interested, here is what $72 million buys these days. If BO turns out to be a less injury-prone Matt Schaub 2.0, then the deal is probably just on the high side of okay. But for fans expecting Osweiler to take the Texans to the next level (which would be making it to the AFC Championship game), Red thinks probably not. Which means for ol’ Billy Bob Texansfan, this move is likely to disappoint. Safe to say, however, that Rick Smith and Coach Bill O’Brian have staked their careers in Houston on this move.
Entire 5th Circuit to Decide Fate of Texas Voter ID Law
The Texan Republican Party’s Voter ID law passed by the Legislature still has some life. A U.S. District Court in Corpus Christi ruled that the law (known as Senate Bill 14) was in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and that decisions was upheld by a 3 judge panel of the Fifth Circuit. Now the entire Court has decided to hear the case – which is likely an ominous sign for the voters of Texas. The notoriously conservative court of appeals is likely to uphold the discriminatory law whose only purpose is to suppress voter turnout for poor, elderly and non-white citizens.
At trial, the burden was on the law’s opponents to show discriminatory impact and the plaintiffs succeeded. Unfortunately, the State does not have the burden to establish a rationale basis for the law. Unfortunate, because it would be impossible to do so. There is no in person voter fraud in Texas that has ever affected the outcome on an election – at least not on the part of the voters. Texas has been unable to point to more than one or two reported instances of in person voter fraud. Everyone who knows anything about elections knows that all the potential electoral hanky-panky occurs with the mail in ballots. And the Voter ID law does nothing to prevent that. This has always been about Republicans attempting to suppress the vote and nothing more. Shame on the GOP for promoting this farce.
Today in Texas History – March 10

From the Annals of the Civil War – In 1864, President Abraham Lincoln appointed Ulysses S. Grant as Lieutenant General in command over all Union forces. Grant was promoted from Major General in command of the western front of the War with the Armies of the Tennessee and Cumberland. From this point on, the fate of the Nation rested largely in the hands of one rather ordinary man who had both a hatred and genius for war. At the beginning of the war, if anyone had suggested that Sam Grant, the failed shopkeeper and farmer from Ohio, would rise to command the entire Union Army, the laughing and knee slapping would have gone on for hours. In fact, Grant himself would probably have thought that he might aspire to be a competent Brigade commander based on his West Point training and experience in the Mexican-American War. Grant’s primary experience had been as a quartermaster in charge of supplies and provisions. From that work, Grant knew exactly what was required for fighting units to succeed. His first units were superbly equipped and it showed on the battlefield. Grant’s victories at Forts Henry and Donelson were two of the very few early Union successes and were widely publicized in the North. These victories secured him a quick promotion to Major General and command of the Army of the Tennessee. And his victory at Shiloh, at almost unspeakable cost for both sides, secured him a top leadership position for the remainder of the war. Grant understood that just being in the Army was the greatest danger most soldiers faced. More troops were dying from illness and disease than from combat wounds. It was a brutal numbers game, but he was determined to bring the war to a swift conclusion by fighting. The 30 Days campaign was intended to do just that and it broke the back of the Army of Northern Virginia. Even though the war on the Eastern front settled into trench combat for many months, the 30 Days Campaign assured ultimate Union victory. It is not hyperbole to say that but for U.S. Grant, there is no United States of America as we know it.
Grant has been much maligned over the years as an incompetent general and corrupt politician. His skill as a military man should be unquestioned. His greatest blunder was at Cold Harbor where troops were forced to wait to assault Confederate lines giving the rebels a chance to dig in. Grant was forthright in acknowledging his mistake. But as a general, he knew he had the power of men and might on his side and used them effectively. As President (for Grant was not a politician), his administration had several notable achievements. He secured the Treaty of Washington which ended all disputes between the U.S. and Great Britain and set in place the greatest alliance of the past 175 years, he almost single-handedly stopped the extirpation of the plains Indians, he balanced the budget, he supported the rights of the freedmen in the South (who were later abandoned by the Republican Party), and negotiated the annexation of the Dominican Republic (which was stopped by a short-sided Congress).
There is some new thinking on Grant, exemplified by Jean Edward Simith’s tremendous biography Grant. And if you are in the mood for an excellent read on Texas in the late 1840’s, read Grant’s Memoirs.
Whither the GOP (cont.)?
Salon does an excellent job of explaining the choice now facing Republican voters in choosing between (1) Donald Trump – running for President on a cult of personality that would make Kim Jung Il blush; or (2) Sen. Ted Cruz (TP-Texas) who would likely be the most radical major party candidate to ever win the nomination.
Indeed, last year the site analyzed the voting records, public policy statements, and fundraising sources of 32 major Republican presidential candidates, going all the way back to Barry Goldwater, and concluded that Cruz was the most right-wing candidate out of this entire group.
Per this analysis, Cruz is far more right-wing than such relatively “liberal” figures — all from that distant era before the Republican Party was taken over by hard-right ideologues — as Richard Nixon, Bob Dole and George H.W. Bush. He is also much more right-wing than Mitt Romney and John McCain. But that isn’t the half of it: based on their respective political records, Ted Cruz makes Newt Gingrich, Ronald Reagan and the current Tea Party-dominated Republican Congress look liberal by comparison.
Cruz Wins! Sort of . . .
Sen. Ted Cruz (TP-Texas) won the GOP primary in the White People’s Republic of Idaho last night. Everywhere else? Not so much. Trump’s impressive victories in Michigan and Mississippi show that he has support in highly diverse states. Meanwhile, Cruz is demonstrating what a win in Iowa can do for a candidate. Look what it did for Rick Santorum in 2012. Without that initial victory, Cruz is likely long gone from the race. Trump now has a clear path to victory. Wins in Ohio and Florida will likely seal the deal for the billionaire bloviator. The only question coming out of last night is will whiny Marco Rubio will hang on until he loses his home state and hurt his chances for the future, or pull out now to save face.
Today in Texas History – March 9
From the Annals of the Colonists – In 1731, colonists from the Canary Islands established Villa de San Fernando. Under the leadership of Juan Leal Goraz, the group marched overland from Veracruz to the presidio of San Antonio de Bexar. The party had increased by marriages on the way to fifteen families with a total of fifty-six persons. They joined a military community that had been in existence since 1718. The group ultimately became part of the Villa of San Fernando de Bexar, the first regularly organized civil government in Texas. Several of the old families of San Antonio trace their descent from the Canary Island colonists. María Rosa Padrón was the first baby born of Canary Islander descent in San Antonio.
Why is Hilary Inevitable?
The latest polling continues to show Sanders as the better general election candidate. Of course, November is a long ways off and the Republicans have not started to throw dirt at Bernie yet. But the numbers are troubling for Hilary. If she loses to Cruz, the new blog will be Paradise in the Frozen North – because Red is moving to Canada.
Today in Texas History – March 8
From the Annals of the Revolution – In 1798, Mathew Caldwell was born in Kentucky. In 1831, Caldwell settled in Dewitt County. Caldwell earned the name “Paul Revere of the Texas Revolution” because he rode from Gonzales to Bastrop to call men to arms before the battle of Gonzales in October 1835. He was also a signer of the Texas Declaration of Independence and a seemingly tireless fighter.
After independence, Caldwell remained active in military service. In 1839, President Mirabeau Lamar named Caldwell captain of a company of rangers to be raised for the defense of Goliad. He was also involved in several fights with Native Americans. He was wounded at the Council House Fight in March of 1840. He recovered and headed a company at the Battle of Plum Creek on August 12. He was also involved in the Texan Santa Fe Expedition in 1841 where he was captured with the expedition and imprisoned in Mexico. Upon release he hastened to the relief of San Antonio and on September 18, 1842, commanded a force of 200 men who met and defeated Adrian Woll in the Battle of Salado Creek. Caldwell County is named in his honor.
